Where have all our plaques gone?

In concluding my Phage Hunt with no phage discovery (*sad face*) I have been contemplating the reasons I stopped finding so many plaques. Heather linked us an interesting article about the factors influencing plaque growth so I thought I would share my view on it! First I will discuss some background information around bacteriophage plaque formation and how we achieve this in a laboratory setting. Then I will explore possible reasons for our dwindling amount of plaque formation, in attempt to answer: Where have all our plaques gone?

 

What are plaques?

A plaque is clear zone formed in a lawn of bacterial cells, in our case P. fluorescens SBW25 bacteria. This clearing indicates death of the bacteria in that area, due to lysis by any present bacteriophages. A single phage will infect a bacteria, replicating and releasing progeny phages that diffuse and infect neighbouring bacteria, thus giving a circular pattern of death (For more information about the action of bacteriophages have a read of Sarah’s post ‘Phage Hunt NZ Post: Fighting with phages’). Plaques may vary in size depending on the growth conditions and strain of phage present. Lytic strain phages are likely to give a clear plaque while lysogenic strains a more turbid plaque. The picture below demonstrates what typical plaques look like on a bacterial lawn, note the circular shape.

pic plaque lawn

Read more about phage plaques here: http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/~smaloy/MicrobialGenetics/topics/phage/plaques.html

 

How do we form plaques in the lab?

To form plaques from a sample containing bacteriophages we incubate the phage sample with the bacteria (SBW25), then plate with nutrient-containing top agar on an LB plate. The plate is then left overnight to incubate, allowing plaque formation. This process was the basis of most of our phage hunt, as it allowed us to purify the phage samples we had obtained.

 

What influences the formation of plaques?

Getting a phage to form plaques isn’t as easy as it seems, we definitely found this out in our experimentation! One point that really caught my attention in the mentioned article was the great plaque count anomaly: “Less than 1% of the phages observed using microscopy have ever been grown in culture”. This indicates the great difficulty in forming plaques; many phages will be unable to do so and those that are able to, depend on a variety of conditions.

The concentration of agar used in the top agar will effect plaque formation. The article explains that plaque size increases as the velocity of phage diffusion increases. This may have hindered our results as small phages may be unable to form plaques in high agar concentration, as they cannot diffuse through the medium to infect bacteria. A decrease in agar concentration may therefore increase the amount of plaques forming. Another condition that affects plaque formation is incubation temperature, different phages being unable to replicate at some temperatures. In our experiments we chose an incubation temperature of 32°C, this may have prevented replication in some phages that were present.

The addition of specific cofactors may be required in some phages for plaque propagation to occur, for example calcium and magnesium ions. A cofactor is a substance necessary for certain reactions within a phage, allowing successful growth. Therefore addition of substances such as CaCl2 to the media will result in larger plaques. In some cases, for plaques to form the host bacteria must also be in a certain growth phase, the log or stationary phase, as this influences phage replication. The log phase is characterised by exponential bacterial growth, while the stationary phase is when growth has reached equilibrium. Ensuring the SBW25 bacteria are in the correct growth phase will increase formation of plaques.

Read the article here: http://www.dairyscience.info/index.php/enumeration-of-lactococcal-bacteriophages/factors-affecting-plaque-formation.html?showall=1&limitstart=

With so many varying conditions that influence forming of plaques it’s no wonder we struggled to successfully do so. While we may have altered a number of these conditions in our experiments it would be difficult to get them all at the optimum level for our phages to show themselves. Even though I didn’t manage to isolate my own phage in the end, this process has definitely been very interesting and taught me a lot about bacteriophages. I hope I have better luck next time!

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Where have all our plaques gone?

  1. drhhnz says:

    Your “1%” quote really captured my attention. Electron microscopy is extremely high powered stuff and I found a paper that says that the first ever micrograph of a bacteriophage was taken in 1940. Check it out here: https://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/bacteriophage/AckermannBP1-4.pdf

  2. charlotterobertson007 says:

    The “<1%" comment got me too. The abstract of that paper also mentioned that there are an estimated 10^31 phage on Earth. This made me wonder why, if phage are so numerous, are we finding so few on our lab? You have alluded to this in your post: phage have optimal environmental conditions. To be able successfully isolate and store phage, we must create an environment that is favourable for them. Bacteria occupy many different environments (check this out – http://science1.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast13apr_1/ – they even live on the sea floor… without sunlight. How cool!). So it is not surprising that we aren't finding billions of phage on each plate! I believe this is because we have designed the 'environment' of the plates to be favourable for the bacterium we are working with – Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25. One of the most important factors for phage survival is the presence of a suitable host, in our case P. fluorescens. The environments we have created on the agar plates should favour phage that can infect P. fluorescens, significantly reducing the number of phage that we could potentially find.

  3. naturaljess says:

    It would be interesting to hear more about how you formed plaques in the lab – such as the picking of plaques and the efforts to purify the phage sample so that we only have one phage growing in our agar. The factors you have mentioned definitely shed some light on the possible plight of our phages!

  4. jojoamy says:

    @drhhnz Wow I didn’t know electron microscopy has been around for so long! No wonder it has advanced to be able to view so many phages that are otherwise undetectable. I wish we had the ability to view our samples with these microscopes, that would be awesome.

    @charlotterobertson007 I was wondering about that too, even though the phages are so numerous we only had a 1/10 chance of getting any in sample. I wonder the basis of this probability? I would assume only a very small percentage would have the ability to infect our SBW25 bacteria, but even then I would have thought the probability would be higher.

  5. nathanalexanderlong says:

    Well i guess now we know why we are not getting any plaques, we have had a contamination this whole time. The other day Heather Ezra and myself examined bacterial samples from the bacteria in the “fabio” big Jess’s phage, a wild type SBW 25 sample and one of Exra’s plates and the results were surprising. We found Ezra’s plate had been contaminated by a diamond shaped, bacterial sized organism but it appeared to have a nucleus. This contamination wasn’t just noticeable under the microscope the two different samples were a distinct different colour and also smelled different.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s